Feed Stock: Teachers and Personnel Under Wardynski

Filed in polityTags: , ,

Citizen Comments

You know, I speak in public settings on a regular basis; every teacher does. As such I tend to be forgiving when I hear a public official offer up a slip of the tongue. Anyone who speaks regularly is going to eventually say something in a way that isn’t appropriate.

So when George W. Bush claimed, “Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?” I chuckled and moved on. When Barack Obama discussed his bowling game with Jay Leno by saying, “No, no. I’ve been practicing. I bowled a 129. It’s like, it was like Special Olympics, or something,” I was surprised at his insensitivity, but I let it go without comment (although I was pleased when he called Timothy Shriver the chairman of Special Olympics to apologize).

But sometimes our slips reveal more about our inner thinking than we would like to acknowledge. Freud said this in Psychopathology of Everyday Life in 1901 when he argued that, “What we observe in normal persons as slips of the tongue gives the same impression as the first step of the so-called ‘paraphasias’ which manifests themselves under pathologic conditions.”

In other words, sometimes a slip isn’t a just a slip. I think that we have a situation like this here.

On Thursday night Dr. Wardynski was introducing the newly selected “Teachers on Special Assignment” that he’s been discussing publicly for the past couple of months. Here’s what he had to say:

These individuals were selected through a rigorous process, uh, by a district level committee of highly effective principals and teachers, to serve over the next two years as Teachers on Special Assignment in elementary schools, and uh, P-8s across our district. They will become part of the feed stock of future school leaders to serve in our district for years to come. We congratulate them and thank them for standing forward to assume the mantel of leadership.

Later in the meeting during the “intimidating” citizens comments, Dr. Wardynski shook his head no when it was pointed out that he had said this.

You know, this slip, by itself, would be meaningless. But when you combine this slip with other comments that Dr. Wardynski has made in the past, the meaning starts to become clear.

As is common of Broad Foundation graduates, Dr. Wardynski regularly refers to teachers, staff, and basically anyone other than himself and his friends as “Human Capital.” Here’s a slide that was produced by LEANFrog at the behest of the Superintendent where the double standard becomes quite clear. You’ll note the juxtaposition of the “Strong Executive Leadership Team” and the need for “Human Capital Flexibility.” (You’ll also not that accountability is assigned to “Staff for Operational Performance” but not to the “strong executive leadership team.”)

Headrick Conclusions

Again, if these were just words, none of this would matter. But on Wednesday, May 16, 2012, teachers across the district were called out of their classrooms to the principal’s office to be informed by the principal, often with Mr. Al Lankford in attendance, that they were being transferred to other schools in the district.

At one school, the teachers were told to bring their classes with them to the principal’s office, to have their students wait in the hallway, unattended, while the teacher was informed that she would be moved at the end of the year to another school in the district.

During the special called board meeting on Monday, May 21, 2012 at 8:00am, I suppose that these decisions will be approved by the board during their Human Resource Report and a “business operations matter.”

Teachers don’t matter. Tenure doesn’t matter. Seniority doesn’t matter. Need doesn’t matter. All that matters is that the superintendent has decided to move teachers and principals around.

Feed stock doesn’t deserve human decency.

Feed stock doesn’t need a voice in their own future.

Feed stock certainly doesn’t know what might be or might not be best for it’s students.

Feed stock only needs to be flexible and accountable and to do what it is told to do by the “Strong Executive Leadership Team.”

You know, you may not be convinced by Freud. That’s fine. The first time I heard about the Freudian Slip, I didn’t attribute its insight to Freud either. In fact, Freud himself once said, “Everywhere I go, I find that a poet has been there before me.”

In the case of the Freudian Slip, he was right. In this case that poet was Jesus.

You brood of vipers! How can you speak good things, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. –Matthew 12:34

Dr. Wardynski views educators as test proctors. Skill, talent, and art aren’t necessary. Feed stock doesn’t ask why. His heart is speaking clearly on this matter.

Intimidating the Public

Filed in polityTags: , , , ,

Watching from the hallway.

Well, tonight was interesting. It seems that the superintendent was concerned that there might be a video mob of some sort at the board meeting tonight. I wonder why he would be concerned about that?

There were no less that six district security personnel at the board meeting tonight. And even more disconcerting than that, there were at least five marked Huntsville Police Department cars and one unmarked police car present at the meeting tonight.

During the citizen comments, which I think were nearly cancelled tonight as they were left off the agenda, there were approximately 10 security personnel in the board room.

And that was after all the general public entered the building through a metal detector again.

The only time this level of security was present was during the removal of the Lee High name from the new high school. Then I think there may have been three district personnel and perhaps two or three armed police officers.

Oh, and there was no metal detector that night.

I have heard through the grapevine that security was concerned that there might be a video flash mob of sorts tonight

And of course that would have been just terrible. It’s absolutely terrible when the public pays attention to what elected and appointed officials say and do.

There was at least one person there tonight who did record at least part of the meeting in an open way. This person, and no it wasn’t me, was recording the meeting in the full view of district security and Huntsville Police, and yet she/he was not asked to leave or stop recording.

I chose not to attempt to record the meeting tonight as it was fully broadcast on ETV, and frankly, because I wasn’t interested in spending the night in jail.

However, every time I turned around, there was yet another security personnel walking up toward me.

This despite my standing in the hallway the entire night watching the meeting on the TV monitors in the hallway. (I gave up my chair a few times to various people, and so ended up in the hallway.) It was kinda crowded tonight.

I wonder why the board and superintendent would be so worried about people paying attention to them that they would feel the need to have HPD present for additional security?

I wonder why there were so many of them actually in the board room while I was speaking?

It seems that perhaps I was being singled out tonight despite Mrs. McCaulley’s claims on Sunday night via email that I wasn’t being singled out.

I wonder how she feels now?

I was allowed to speak tonight. I believe that the superintendent and the board were genuinely surprised when I didn’t make the entire three minutes about me. If you’re interested, here’s what I had to say:

In honor of the Rave Cinemas support of the autism community at the beginning of the month with their “Avenge Autism” walk, I considered wearing my Hulk Smash gloves tonight, but then I was concerned that Mr. Blair might be the only person here to get the joke.

Hulk smash hands

So I left them at home.

After all, I wouldn’t want anyone to think I was intimidating, disruptive or threatening as I have been called.

For the record, it has never been my intention to intimidate or threaten any one, and I’ve gone to great lengths to avoid disrupting the board meetings in any way. I haven’t even allowed my comments to run over the three-minute limit.

I’m not here to threaten anyone. I’m not here to intimidate anyone, and I appreciate having heard from Mrs. Morrison, Mr. Birney, Mrs. McCaulley, and Mr. Blair that they as individuals have not felt threatened by me. It would be nice if the board could publicly state that, but I’ll take what I can get.

I do not, however, apologize for asking questions and expecting answers.

Education without the free ability to question isn’t education. It’s indoctrination. And I’m sure that we can all agree that is not our goal here.

In that light, here are a few questions:

How is it helpful to students to tell their teachers that they’re being moved to another school while the students wait in the hallway? Teaching while holding back tears doesn’t seem helpful to me.

Why are we still discussing Dr. Wardynski’s bonus while teachers’ step raises are still frozen and starting salaries are still set to the state minimum?

Why are we on a pace to spend 7 million dollars less than the published budget on Special Education, which is exactly the same projected surplus that Mr. Spinelli is predicting for the end of the year? In other words, why are you balancing the budget on the backs of special education students?

Questions aren’t intimidating to people who believe they are doing the right thing.

Thank You.

Not one board member spoke to me tonight, and the superintendent chose not to respond to anything I had to say.

I did get a nod from Mr. Lankford at one point, but no direct communication.

There was a significant amount of intimidation, disruption to normal events, and fairly overt threats tonight (and this week). But it didn’t come from me. It was instead the superintendent through his security team who was attempting to intimidate the public into silence.

 

An Appropriate Education

Filed in polityTags: , , , , , , ,

HCSBoard Seal

So there’s another board meeting tomorrow night at 5:30pm at the Merts Center, 200 White Street. I’ll be there, and supposing that there aren’t any technical issues that halt the broadcast as there was two weeks ago, you can watch it at home on ETV (Comcast 17, Knology 99), and at the Huntsville City Schools website. I’ll be whining away on Twitter @russwinn during the meeting. You can also catch my posts on the Geek Palaver Facebook Page. All of this supposes of course that I will be allowed to attend the meeting.

The agenda for tomorrow has been published, and they’re going to talk (again?!?) about evaluating the superintendent, the new school calendar,  and just how wonderful hiring countless numbers of consultants has been for the district.

So, again, while teachers salaries are still set at the state minimum, while teachers STEP raises are still frozen, on a night when they are going to discuss “Principals’ Terminations,” the superintendent will likely walk home with a $10,000 bonus in his pocket for successfully passing the test that the board specifically designed for him to be able to pass.

(One of the standards of evaluation that was placed upon Dr. Wardynski was to raise AP participation rates. As he himself indicated even before they voted to approve that as one of his goals, he had already accomplished that. It’s nice when your standard for success includes items that you’ve already completed.)

Yes, they will be discussing this bonus even before they discuss the new state assembly mandated school calendar.

Concerning the calendar: it seems that Dr. Wardynski and the board should actually thank the assembly for providing political cover for his decision to remove fall break from the calendar. Remember tomorrow night when Dr. Robinson calls for citizens to complain about their loss of a fall break to their representatives in Montgomery that she, along with every member of the board except Mr. Blair, had already approved a school calendar that removed fall break.

Here’s a listing of the significant dates including closed dates:

  • August 20, 2012: First Day of School
  • September 3, 2012: Labor Day
  • No Fall Break (This was already gone in Dr. Wardynski’s original calendar for 2012-2013)
  • November 12, 2012: Veterans Day
  • November 21-23, 2012: Thanksgiving Break
  • December 24-January 2: Christmas Break
  • January 21, 2013: MLK Day
  • March 25-29, 2013: Spring Break
  • May 23, 2013: Last Day of School

There are no built-in weather days, but it is unclear at this time how weather days will be handled. It is at least possible by one interpretation of the “Beach Bill” that those days might be allowed to occur after May 23, 2013. Another interpretation would mean that the school day would be required to be extended until the hours are made up. I would be quite surprised if even our esteemed representatives know for sure.

It’s always nice when education suffers as a direct result of industry lobbying. I love the Alabama Gulf Coast, but this is an evil decision they have forced upon the state. It’s remarkably similar to Dr. Wardynski’s decisions to privatize so many of the district’s functions. Again, if it weren’t for the district taking his control, Dr. Wardynski would, I’m sure, love the sentiment behind the decision: namely that public education should be run by private organizations, industries, and businesses.

There will, after all, be at least four new contracts approved tomorrow night with private organizations.

After this discussion they will move on to an encomium of all the amazing, wonderful, fantastic, astonishing contractors who don’t cost us anything, they save us money. I’m sure it will sound nothing like a (warning: stereotype ahead) woman coming home from the store with three-hundred dollars on the credit card talking about all the money she “saved.” Verifiable evidence will be in short supply.

Oh, and there’s an ominously titled item called “Principals’ Terminations” under new business.

And finally, despite my best efforts to clear all of this mess up before tomorrow’s meeting, I still don’t know if the board or Dr. Wardynski will allow the public to video record the meeting tomorrow night.

Here’s the question I asked of Mrs. McCaulley as School Board President:

Will I be allowed to record future public board meetings in accordance with Alabama State Code 36-35A-6? [This section states: "A meeting of a governmental body, except while in executive session, may be openly recorded by any person in attendance by means of a tape recorder or any other means of sonic, photographic or video reproduction provided the recording does not disrupt the conduct of the meeting. The governmental body may adopt reasonable rules for the implementation of this section."].

To this question, Mrs. McCaulley responded on Sunday, May 13, 2012 at 9:28pm:

Response: As president of the board you have my permission to operate within the perimeters of the law. After I read the Alabama State Code Section 36-35A-6, you cited above, I noticed it used the term “may be openly recorded”   therefore one could interpret openly recording is not a mandate or requirement but optional.

You’ll note that she has not stated if I may actually record the meeting tomorrow night without being asked to leave the meeting again, and without being told I was “intimidating the board” as Mr. Lankford said, or called “intimidating and threatening” as Mrs. Anderson stated in an email to the Huntsville Times last Tuesday.

I followed up this non-response from the board President by asking:

“If on Thursday, May 17th, I attempt to record the board meeting in exactly the same manner as I did on Thursday, May 3rd, should I expect to be asked to leave the meeting?”

I have received no response to this question.

So, if I should attempt to record the meeting tomorrow night, I have no idea how the Superintendent will direct his staff to react.

Please note, it is not my intention to “intimidate,” “disrupt,” or “threaten” anyone or anything.

I am grateful to Mrs. McCaulley for saying that I have not intimidated her. I also appreciate the communications I received from Mrs. Morrison and Mr. Birney saying the same thing. Mr. Blair chose to state in the press that he had always found me “pleasant and cordial.”

So I’ve got that going for me. :)

I have not, however, heard anything at all from my board member Dr. Jennie Robinson. Neither have I heard anything from Dr. Wardynski.

I suppose that when Mr. Lankford said I was “intimidating the board” by recording them, and when Mrs. Anderson stated that I “had been described as intimidating and threatening” (that, by the way, was the first time that I’ve been informed that I was “threatening”) for doing so, that they were talking about how Dr. Robinson and Dr. Wardynski felt. They are, after all the only ones left.

I have asked for any specific documented evidence that I have intimidated, disrupted, or threatened anyone at the district level.

The only response I’ve received from Mrs. McCaulley is:

Again to your inquiry about any written incidents reports concerning you, to my knowledge there are none.

Thus there is, at least to Mrs. McCaulley’s knowledge, no documented evidence that I have done any of the things I’ve been accused of doing.

I have also, not received anything approaching an apology for the district staff’s response to me, but that’s okay. I’m not really sure that it would mean much at this point anyway.

And frankly, I’m certain that they were only following orders.

You see, I don’t actually care what they say about me. And truthfully, I don’t care if they allow me to record the meeting or not.

None of that is important to me.

What is important is that my children receive an appropriate education. I am convinced that cutting Special Education by seven million dollars (or the exact amount of surplus the district is anticipating at the end of the fiscal year) has kept my boy from having an appropriate education. I am convinced that merging my girl’s school without discussing it with parents first will keep my girl from having an appropriate education.

I am convinced that having a demoralized faculty and staff in our schools keeps my children from having an appropriate education.

I am convinced that having people who don’t want to be teachers, teach keeps my children from having an appropriate education.

I am convinced that having a CSFO who can spend $28,790 without documentation keeps my children from having an appropriate education.

I am convinced that having district leadership that attempts to intimidate parents and teachers for asking questions keeps my children from having an appropriate education. When people aren’t allowed to ask questions, education has been replaced by indoctrination.

This is what I’m concerned about. These are a few of the issues that really matter.

New and Improved: TFA Is Neither

Filed in polityTags: ,

New Peanuts?

You remember when you were a child going to a store, and you saw a toy you wanted? Perhaps there are just two on the shelf. Maybe two Lukes from Star Wars. They look exactly the same to you, except for two small differences. One of them, for some reason, cost thirty cents more than the other.

In those days, thirty cents made a world of difference. After all, you could get the latest Detective Comics to go along with the Luke for that. So, what kid in his right mind would buy the more expensive Luke?

Well, no one.

But we’re forgetting about the other difference between the two Lukes. And that, as Frost says, makes all the difference.

The more expensive Luke had a sticker on the package that said, “New” or “Improved,” or god help us, “New and Improved.”

And suddenly that copy of Detective Comics would just have to wait because coming home with a “New and Improved” Luke would make me the envy of all the boys on the block.

I’d just have to make sure I kept the packaging to prove to everyone that my Luke was actually newer and improved-er than their Luke.

It’s funny how little things change as we grow up.

As I was walking through the grocery today, I noticed a can of Planters peanuts that had a flag on it’s side reading “NEW.”

Honestly, new peanuts? Somehow I don’t think the peanut has changed much, do you? But I’d bet that Planters marketing department will have 10 studies showing that putting the “New” label on the can increases sales or profits or both.

And that’s what this is all about. Sales and Profits.

Today, the Birmingham News ran just such a promotional, or puff, piece on Teach for America called, “Birmingham City schools praise Teach for America” by Marie Leech.

She tells the story of history teacher Wyatt Smith who “came in one day and said he had a special guest for us, and came back in dressed as Abe Lincoln and did a rap song before the exit exam with everything we’d learned. He doesn’t care about making a fool out of himself to make you learn.”

Leech calls Smith’s style, “unquestionably non traditional, but filled with energy.”

You know, she’s right, having a teacher who dresses up as a character is a great way of teaching students about that character. I think the first time I saw it put into practice was in Vacation Bible School about forty years ago. The pastor dressed up as Jesus and walked in carrying a cross.

I’m pretty sure I saw it again in nearly every elementary classroom, middle, and even a few high school classrooms (although by that point most of the students in my classes would have thought it silly). I even had a seminary professor who regularly came to class wearing a red ascot impersonating the Devil.

I’m sorry Ms. Leech, but there’s nothing, absolutely nothing “non-traditional” about dressing up as a character to get student’s interested in a topic. Teachers have been doing this for nearly as long as there have been people wishing to teach others. You might want to take a look at Plato’s writings about Socrates on occasion to see what I’m talking about. Socrates is constantly depicted as adopting roles in his efforts to educate the youth of Athens.

Leech also talks about Audrianna Archibald, one of the few (in 2009 about 3%) TFAers who also has an education degree. Ms. Archibald says, “In the college of education, they taught us lesson plans, but there was no sense of urgency. Also, tracker are not taught in education. That’s probably the biggest thing taught in TFA, is tracking each student’s progress and letting parents know how their child is progressing.”

Honestly, she says that a college of education doesn’t teach tracking a student’s progress.

Seriously?

She goes on to say, “I go to their birthday parties; I go to church with them. If you want them to be completely engulfed in what you’re teaching, then you have to build those relationships or it’s hard to get them focused on what you want them to do.”

Again, there is nothing, absolutely nothing “non-traditional” about building relationships with your students in order to educate them. My children’s teachers have been to their birthday parties:

Terri CropedSusan Croped

They’ve been to church with their kids. They encourage their kids to follow their passions and celebrate their successes:

Honors

They volunteer their time, money, and sweat to support events like the Autism Walk:

Team Matthew

Getting involved in children’s lives is, frankly, standard operating procedure for every teacher than my children have ever had. And anyone who tries to tell you this isn’t the case isn’t paying attention.

Or they’re trying to sell you something.

Teaching Matters

Leech goes on to praise a French teacher named Heidi Kershner who is using an innovative method of teaching French called “immersion.”

I’ve got to just stop here for a moment. To be honest, I had a terrible time with French, Spanish, and in college, German. My inabilities to learn and speak foreign languages was legendary. My peers regularly used me to encourage others after a test: “Well at least you didn’t do as bad as Russell.”

But come on. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, “innovative” about using “immersion” as a method for teaching foreign languages. This method has been used for as long as anyone has attempted to teach a foreign language to someone. The more immersed the person, the quicker the person adopts the language.

Truthfully, the only person who would believe that any of the examples offered in this article are “innovative” or “non-traditional” would be a person who doesn’t have any idea what education is. If these examples demonstrate anything at all, they are examples that demonstrate the inexperience of the people offering them up as “innovative.”

All this article proves is that TFAers don’t have enough experience to know that their innovative methods have been in practice for, at times, thousands of years.

Every single teacher I know of makes use of all of these methods and many, many more because teachers, particularly teacher with experience, know that how you reach a child differs with every single child.

And so, someone must be selling us something.

The one objectively true statement in this “traditional”-teachers-are-no-damn-good puff piece is this:

The teachers earn the same salary as a first-year teacher in Birmingham city schools, roughly $36,000 plus benefits. The district also pays a $5,000-per-teacher, per-year fee to Teach for America for recruitment, placement and training.

That’s right. A TFAer costs tax-payers $10,000 (TFAers stay for two years–the total is therefore $10,000 per TFAer) more than those boring, so-called “traditional” teachers.

There’s no specific evidence that TFAers out perform traditional teachers. At best, they are about the same–and yet they cost more.

There’s no specific evidence offered in Leech’s article that TFAers approaches to teaching are “unquestionably non traditional” as she claims.

There is evidence that TFAers cost more.

There is evidence that TFA of Alabama is attempting to sell us something. The Alabama Education Trust Fund budget for FY 2012 appropriated $611,100 for Teach for America.

There is evidence that TFA’s assets have increased by 623% over the past ten years to $337,962,466.

There is evidence that the Broad Foundation has 1.6 billion dollars in assets at the end of 2010.

Wouldn’t it be nice if million dollar corporations like TFA and billion dollar foundations like the Eli Broad Foundation would celebrate teachers who do exactly the same work, but don’t cost $10,000 more?

But then those teachers couldn’t be called “new and improved” could they. Those teachers don’t grow TFA’s coffers by 623%, do they?

No. Those traditional teachers just teach.

They give their lives, not just two years, to inspiring students to learn. They give their lives, not just two years, looking for ways to connect with their students. They give their lives, not just two years, looking for ways to immerse their students in their subject matter. They give their students their lives.

“New and Improved” is just another way of separating a fool from his money.

We need not be fooled by repackaged peanuts again.

It would be nice if the Birmingham News could stop giving TFA free advertisements. I hope the Huntsville Times will avoid doing so next year when Dr. Wardynski starts singing the praises of TFAers for doing the same things that teachers have been doing for thousands of years. He certainly won’t tell us if the TFAers are failing. I hope that the Times, unlike the Birmingham News, will.

Taking Credit

Filed in polityTags: , , ,

HCSBoard Seal

Two of our high schools, Huntsville High and Grissom High, have received national recognition from the U.S. News and World Report ranking of high schools in the United States, and Dr. Cooper, the Deputy Superintendent of Huntsville City Schools said on Wednesday in an interview with WHNT that this national ranking “shows that our commitment to student achievement is working.”

During the televised interview she went on to say:

We have an extremely passionate staff. Our district is committed. Our community is committed . . . We’ve been very thoughtful about what we’ve done in our high schools . . . We definitely take our test scores very seriously. At the beginning of the year, our principals are sitting down with their staffs reviewing the test scores.

You can watch the entire interview here although the quote concerning this achievement showing “our commitment to student achievement is working” is not a part of the televised interview. That quote is taken from the web site text accompanying the video.

You know, aside from the fact that this ranking is based primarily and solely on test scores, there’s nothing wrong with celebrating the achievements of our local schools. In fact, this is something that Dr. Cooper does quite well. Her primary responsibilities at the board meetings so far this year have in fact been to celebrate student, faculty, administrator and district achievements during the Superintendent’s Celebrations. Dr. Cooper has the unenviable task of reading the proclamations to those in attendance. She handles these responsibilities well, and as my daughter has received one of these celebrations, I am grateful to her for her work in setting these up.

While she has a right to celebrate Huntsville High’s and Grissom High’s achievements, she does not have a right to take credit for those achievements as her quotes indicate she is doing. During the video and in the story accompanying the video, she refers to her role in this achievement about ten separate times.

“Our commitment to student achievement,” “Our district,” “Our community,” “We’ve been thoughtful,” “What we’ve done,” “our test scores,” and “our principals” all indicate to me that Dr. Cooper believes that she and Dr. Wardynski and their “commitment to student achievement” are at least partly responsible for these two schools’ achievements.

And normally I would be inclined to agree with her. Education is a function of an entire community. No individual can be honestly singled out as deserving credit when a student learns. That credit, as you’re likely to hear at graduation ceremonies over then next few weeks, goes to a whole world of people.

Education is all of our jobs, and as such I have no problem with her taking some of the credit for these successes.

Except for just one small little detail.

The rankings that just came out from U.S. News and World Report are based on test scores from the 2009-2010 school year. Please go and take a look at the U.S. News and World Report methodology site on how they conducted their evaluation. Robert Morse tells us:

We analyzed 21,776 public high schools in 49 states and the District of Columbia. This is the total number of public high schools that had 12th-grade enrollment and sufficient data, primarily from the 2009-2010 school year, to analyze.

These 2012 rankings are based on test scores from the 2009-2010 school year.

Dr. Wardynski didn’t start working for Huntsville City Schools until July 5, 2011. Dr. Cooper didn’t start until October 2011.

In other words, it will be at least two more years before the Wardynski administration can take any part of the credit for future U. S. News and World Report High School rankings. In fact, if any superintendent deserves partial credit for these scores, that superintendent would in fact be Dr. Ann Roy Moore and her policies and not Dr. Casey Wardynski and his.

As Arnold H. Glasgow said, “A good leader takes a little more than his shard of the blame, a little less than his share of the credit.”

Perhaps our current district administration will someday grow into their own claims of being “strong leaders.” As we saw in his acceptance of Superintendent of the Year, they’re not there yet.

__________

For the record, the inspiration of this post came from a private communication from a regular reader. I have asked this reader if I could offer public credit for the suggestion, but this person has declined to be named. However, since I am being critical of the Superintendent for taking credit for others’ work, I do not want to be accused of doing the same. This post is entirely based upon my own research, but a reader, who wishes not to be named, suggested the topic to me. I thank that reader for the suggestion.

Thank You Teachers Everywhere

Filed in polity, spiritTags: , , , , , ,

 

HCSBoard Seal

So, anyone read anything interesting in the paper today?

In case you missed it, here’s a link to Crystal Bonvillian’s article about the events at the board meeting last Thursday, May 3, 2012.

If you’ve missed my account of the evening, you can read about it here and here.

There are just a few follow up points that I would like to make.

__________

First, citizen comments are typically placed at the end of the meeting once all the business is completed. For some reason, I’ve been told it was an accident, the citizen comments portion of the meeting was not broadcasted this past Thursday. The last time citizen comments were broadcast was on April 19, 2012. That evening a teacher, who is well known by the board and Dr. Wardynski, Mrs. Pam Hill, stood to speak. She was frustrated at the way teachers had been treated that night.

This was not a typical comment by Mrs. Hill, but I fully understand her frustration. You see the board, last summer, voted to freeze teachers step raises and reduce teachers starting salaries to the state minimum. And yet at the meeting Dr. Wardynski, who was playing round robin with principals again, claimed that principals, and not teachers, would be rewarded for their teachers’ hard work during the year.

The interesting part was how Dr. Wardynski chose to respond to Mrs. Hill.

Here’s the clip.

 

Yes, rather than simply ignore her as he typically ignores me, Dr. Wardynski decided to “caution” her. He said:

Ms. Hill, you’re an employee of Huntsville City Schools. You do not represent Hampton Cove Elementary School. So that was a misrepresentation. Uh number two, you stood there the night I read the specifications against Principal McGhee. Uh, Principal McGhee was relieved for a whole host of reasons that where upheld in court. That had to do with poor leadership, ethical questions. And so we will relieve such leaders, we will relieve such teachers, and so I would caution you when talking to your employers to speak to them as your employers. The Board is your employer.

And that was the last time citizen comments were broadcast via eTV.

After I completed my comments on Thursday (which I began by saying thank you to Dr. Wardynski), I received several texts letting me know that the eTV broadcast had been turned off at the beginning of the citizen comments. Since Dr. Wardynski indicated that he wanted to respond to my comments, I decided to record his response so that I wouldn’t miss anything he had to say. (Normally, I record the broadcasts on TiVo, but since it wasn’t being broadcast that wasn’t possible.)

I was able to record approximately one minute and fifty-seconds of the remaining comments before I was asked to turn off the iPad.

The only reason I was attempting to record the rest of the meeting was because it wasn’t being broadcast.

__________

Second, I have written to Mrs. Laurie McCaulley to ask for permission to be allowed to record the board meetings in accord with Alabama State Code which states:

“A meeting of a governmental body, except while in executive session, may be openly recorded by any person in attendance by means of a tape recorder or any other means of sonic, photographic, or video reproduction provided the recording does not disrupt the conduct of the meeting. The governmental body may adopt reasonable rules for the implementation of this section.” Alabama Code Section 36-25A-6.

She has not yet responded to my request.

__________

Third, I have not as of this writing, heard from any of the Huntsville City Schools Board of Education members in response to the events on Thursday other than the brief conversation that I had with Mrs. Morrison following the meeting. As I wrote on Thursday, I offered her my apology if I had indeed intimidated her. Her response was to laugh at the unnecessary apology.

To date no one on the board has confirmed that I have the right to record the public portion of the board meetings.

__________

It’s been a busy day on the blog. For any new visitors, I’d like to say thanks for stopping by. I appreciate having the opportunity to be heard. If you have questions, or if you disagree with anything I’ve written here, please take a moment to ask them or raise your issues in the comments.

Alternately, you may email me at geeks@geekpalaver.com. Palaver means holding an in-depth conversation, in case you were wondering.

For all my regular readers: Thank you for taking the time to read my wordy posts. Believe it or not, I do actually trim them down!

Finally, if I may be so bold, I would ask that you remember this one thing:

My being asked to leave the board meeting for recording it is nothing, absolutely nothing, in comparison to the stress and pressure that our teachers, instructional assistants, therapists, staff, custodians, lunch staff, principals, administrators and our kids–especially our kids–have had to face this year, all year without relief.

My being asked to leave is nothing compared to the stress and pressure that our Special Education kids have had to deal with in the face of constant changes to their lives.

If you’ve had an employee of Huntsville City Schools behave in a way that was less supportive than you expected, keep in mind the amount of stress they’ve been under and respond by telling them how much you appreciate their service to our children. It is, after all Teacher (and all our other educators) Appreciation Week.

If you feel a need to do something about the events last Thursday, I would ask that you consider the following:

  1. Thank a Teacher/Educator for her or his dedicated service to our kids.
  2. Call your board member and ask them to make responding to the public a much higher priority than it’s been before.
  3. Continue paying attention to the board meetings. Yes, they’re boring, but the decisions that Dr. Wardynski makes and that the board approves will impact your children’s education for a long time to come. At a minimum, you need to know what those decisions are.
The next board meeting will be on Thursday, May 17th, at 5:30pm at the Merts Center on 200 White Street in Huntsville. The board typically meets on the first and third Thursday of the month. The meetings are also broadcast on eTV (Comcast 17, Knology 99) and streamed on the web at the Huntsville City Schools website, although as we saw this week, that broadcast is not the most reliable way of seeing the entire meeting.
Also, I typically attend every board meeting and live tweet events that seem important to me. You may follow me on twitter  @russwinn. You can follow on Twitter or on the Geek Palaver Facebook Page.
If I could ask just one thing of everyone it would be to let your teachers know how much you appreciate their work. Saying thank you often makes all the difference.
So, thank you teachers (and all those dedicated to education) everywhere.

 

State of the Schools: Special Education

Filed in polityTags: , , ,

photo

On Tuesday April 24th, Dr. Wardynski offered what he called the first annual State of the Schools address. It was an event sponsored and hosted by the Huntsville PTA to allow Dr. Wardynski the opportunity to speak to the public about the state of the schools in Huntsville City. If you’d like to read a good summary of the event, please take a look at Bonvillian’s excellent piece, “Huntsville Superintendent Touts Achievements in First ‘State of the Schools’ Address.” The district has now also posted the video on YouTube. I would suggest that you take an hour out of your day to take a look at it.

If you give it a read (or a watch), please make sure that you read all the way to the end. Bonvillian’s final paragraph contains an accurate assessment of Wardynski’s most touted “achievement” concerning balancing the budget. According to the superintendent, the district is in the black again due to a shifting of funding from the capital fund to the general fund.

Oh and now the district is planning to borrow more money for the capital fund.

It’s pretty easy to “balance” the budget by borrowing more money and shifting it around. It allows a lot of  flexibility to hire consultants to do your job, pay $80,000 just to recruit two principals, and pay an extra $10,000 to hire a TFAer through Teach For America rather than simply hiring them on our own.

I wish my budget had such “flexibility.”

While I certainly do appreciate the Huntsville PTA for sponsoring this event, it clearly took a lot of work to pull this together, I still have to wonder why Dr. Wardynski is so opposed to taking questions at events like this.

Oh wait, now I remember.

So, since there were no questions and since there was no formal response, I thought I would offer a series of responses here on the blog.

As always, I solicit your questions and responses. Questioning makes us all smarter.

__________

It’s been a while since I’ve written about special education in the system. In many ways, that’s been intentional. It’s good for a writer to be able to step back a bit and examine an issue dispassionately, and frankly, I have a difficult time doing that when it comes to special education.

Here’s why:

Watching WtP

It’s hard to be dispassionate when it comes to my boy’s education.

But in honor of Autism Awareness Month, and since Dr. Wardynski mentioned Special Education exactly twice on Tuesday night, I think it’s important to discuss the changes he was bragging about during his State of the Schools address. The first was to say that our first Teach For America “teacher” being hired under the new TFA contract is both a traditionally trained teacher (she/he has a teaching certificate and education degree) and this “teacher” is a Special Education teacher.

Yes, Dr. Wardynski was bragging that the first TFAer would be a Special Education teacher.

The second time that Dr. Wardynski mentioned Special Education in his State of the Schools address was to say that Special Education classrooms would be receiving technology updates over the summer.

Before I offer my own assessment of Special Education in the district, let me respond to these two points.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires that the district provide disabled students a “Free and Appropriate Public Education.”

One key to that requirement is the word “appropriate.” A disabled child’s education must be appropriate for the child. In other words, if a child is blind, it is not appropriate to require the child to respond to visual stimuli. If a child is deaf, it is not appropriate to require the child to respond to sounds.

Children on the spectrum do not adjust well to change. As I’ve written before, even pulling back into the garage to get something you forgot can ruin a day.

Even if, and this is as they say, a BIG IF, this new TFAer is actually qualified, by placing a TFAer into a Special Education resource room, Dr. Wardynski is assuring that those children assigned to that room will face disruption.

You see, unlike a general education classroom, SPED students will typically stay with the same resource teacher for multiple years. This is part of the “appropriate” education. Many SPED students develop more slowly than their non-SPED peers. Having stability in their resource room allows one teacher to track that student’s progress over several years. 50% of TFAers are finished with teaching after two years. 80% are finished after three.

A new study shows that Teacher Turnover Affects All Students’ Achievement. One of the main points that the researchers found was that this affect on achievement was harder on at-risk students such as minorities, and low-achieveing students. While the study did not specifically look at Special Education, it should be clear that Special Education students are among the most at-risk of any demographic.

By hiring temporary teachers for SPED, Dr. Wardynski is ensuring instability in the SPED classrooms.

This combined with hiring instructional assistants from basically temporary agencies at rates and benefits that can’t compete with McDonalds

Let me say that again. By hiring temporary teachers for SPED, Dr. Wardynski is refusing to provide an “appropriate” education to our students. Our Superintendent of the Year is refusing to follow federal law.

Secondly, Dr. Wardynski bragged about updating the technology in SPED classrooms over the summer. As the SPED classrooms and resource rooms are often the absolute last classrooms to receive new technology, this is a welcomed change. (My son’s resource room has been requesting a SmartBoard for years. It is my understanding that his is among the last rooms in the building to receive a SmartBoard.

He’s convinced that technology can supplement personnel.

This is not the case with those SPED children on the Autism Spectrum. While they often have aptitude with technology, the appropriate education isn’t just to funnel children into modes of education that they are already successful in, an appropriate education will challenge students in ways that they are not already comfortable. Children on the spectrum have difficulty with social interaction. As such that is exactly what they need.

They need stable, long-term relationships with people who are trained to work with and connect with them.

Technology can assist students on the spectrum, but it cannot replace personnel.

Finally, as I pointed out, Dr. Wardynski is touting the seven million dollar surplus that he and Mr. Spinelli are predicting to have at the end of the fiscal year in September.

Seven million dollars is a lot of money, and it’s a figure that constantly turns up when discussing special education this year.

Seven million is the difference between the 2011 and 2012 budgets for Special Education. When I asked about it often enough, Mr. Spinelli, upon my request, sent me a Special Ed Expenses October – December 2011 report that miraculously had seven million restored in the 2012 budget for special education.

It seemed that my months of questioning had paid off. That was until I took a look at the actual expenditures for the first quarter and saw that we were spending only about $20 million rather than the budgeted $27 million. (By the way, these numbers held true for the second quarter as well.)

Once again, the totality of the budget surplus appears to be coming from one single group of students.

Special Education.

Cardinal Roger Mahony once said, “Any society, any nation, is judged on the basis of how it treats its weakest members; the last, the least, the littlest.”

By the way, Cardinal Mahony was only paraphrasing, you know, Jesus, when he spoke of how we treat “the least of these” in Matthew chapter 25, verses 31-46.

But if the Cardinal is correct about judging a society and a nation, wouldn’t that also hold true for a school district?

Thus, if the state of our special education students in our schools is not good, then by default, the state of our schools as a whole would also have to be judged not good.

This despite Dr. Wardynski’s claims.

This despite the Huntsville Council of PTAs’ belief that Dr. Wardynski was the Superintendent of the Year.

Huntsville City Schools continues to balance its budget on the backs of our weakest members. How can that be anything but a failure?

 

Intimidation at Board Meetings

Filed in polity, venomTags: , , ,

May 3 Board Meeting

So there’s been a lot said about security at board meetings lately. Take Saturday’s article by Crystal Bonvillian of the Times, “Huntsville school board meeting audience met with metal detectors.”

Laurie McCaulley was told that Al Lankford, the district’s security chief, was concerned about “body language and demeanor at some of the meetings.” This is quite a curious statement.

You see, as someone who regularly attends board meetings, I am, of course, concerned about security at the meetings. Heck, my daughter was in attendance at the board meeting on March 15th, so of course I am interested in making certain that these bi-weekly meetings are safe. Every sane person shares that concern.

If I didn’t believe the meetings were safe, I wouldn’t go. If I didn’t believe they were safe, I certainly wouldn’t have allowed my daughter to attend.

But I do, and I did. And I’ve been at every board meeting since April 7, 2011 except two. In fact, if we count simply the bi-weekly board meetings for the past year, I’ve probably attended more of them than Al Lankford has attended. (For some reason Mr. Lankford wasn’t present from the January 17th meeting until about a month later. I was pleased to see him return.)

In other words, I’ve seen nothing in the audience’s body language and demeanor that would lead me to the conclusion that someone was behaving in a threatening manner. What I see at board meetings are people laughing, talking, applauding, saluting, and mostly sitting quietly and listening to the meeting.

Now, granted, I’m not there to watch the audience; I’m there to listen to the business being conducted. I’m also not a trained security officer. I know for a fact that a trained police officer is capable of “seeing” more than I.

But I am a writer and a teacher. I take my subject matter from observation of people as a writer, and I know when my students are alert, engaged, interested and learning (and I know when they are not) on the basis of their body language. So, while I do not have the years of training that I am sure Mr. Lankford has in identifying a threat, I do believe I am capable of seeing and noticing when someone is behaving in a threatening manner.

So while this is just my unprofessional assessment, not once have I seen anyone in the audience behave in a way that would cause me to be concerned about my safety.

But then I don’t see the world as Mr. Lankford, (or Dr. Wardynski for that matter) sees it. For example, Mr. Lankford, during our conversations on Thursday night asserted that sitting quietly and holding an iPad recording the Superintendent’s comments was an intimidating action. During that same conversation, he also referenced my sitting quietly at the State of the Schools address and holding an iPhone directed toward Dr. Wardynski and his presentation as an intimidating action.

He even claimed that my standing silently for 80 seconds as I waited for a response to my comments as an “intimidating action.” He stated multiple times that I was “intimidating the board” and that he wasn’t going to allow me to do that. He even implied that my sitting silently with my head down, live tweeting the meeting was questionable.

So it seems to me that he sees a threat where I do not.

It seems to me that Dr. Wardynski also sees threats in things that just don’t seem threatening to me. For example, during his presentation to the board concerning his recommendation to put a fence and a “welcome center” (read: guard shack) around the new Lee High campus, he asked for several photos of the neighborhood surrounding Lee High to be displayed for the board and the public.

Here are just a few of the photos he showed to establish the “aesthetic” of the new Lee High campus “neighborhood.” I’ve photographed these shots off of the eTV Broadcast on Thursday night.

Lee Neighborhood2Lee Neighborhood3Lee Neighborhood4

And like any true showman, he saved the best one for last. Here’s what Dr. Wardynski said when he introduced the picture below:

This is in the neighborhood. That fence there is, which fence is that, Glenn? Coca-Cola Plant, and what’s the one on the left? That’s the soldier’s home? So the solder’s home has an ornamental fence as well which adds to the character of the community.

Here’s the picture that accompanied the text that Dr. Wardynski was using to justify the $600,000 fence around Lee High School:

Lee Neighborhood

So, what’s the central detail of this photograph? What’s the first thing to catch your eye? What’s the single detail that will convince much of America that additional security around Lee High is necessary?

Don’t see it? Here’s a close up:

Hoodie

Evidently Dr. Wardynski didn’t see it as he didn’t comment on it, but I see a faceless figure, probably male, approximately six feet tall wearing stained jeans, a dark tee-shirt underneath the scariest item of clothing known to at least parts of America: the Hoodie.

Yes, in order to convince the board to support the new fence around Lee High, he showed them a picture of a person in a hoodie. (Truthfully, I think the board had already made up their minds on this matter. I think this was intended to drive the need for a fence home to the general public.)

Now, for the record, I am not opposed to the fence around Lee High. I think it’s overpriced. I think that the price should have been included in the $40 million spent to build the school, but I don’t think it’s a bad idea. Many schools have a clearly defined parameter.

But the superintendent’s methods of getting what he wants are at best questionable here. While I’m sure he would claim to either not noticing the person in the hoodie or not understanding that it might communicate something that he didn’t intend to communicate, it would seem that he is at least inadvertently using fear, uncertainty, and doubt to get what he wants.

One might even say that he is intimidating others into supporting his recommendation.

So there may have been some acts of intimidation taking place on Thursday night, but if there were, those actions weren’t initiated by me. I was sitting quietly in my seat listening, tweeting, and eventually attempting to record the superintendent’s words until I was ordered to stop.

One might argue that security was being used to intimidate members of the public for undertaking state statute protected activities. One might argue that the superintendent was attempting to influence the board and the public by using emotionally charged, racially charged images. One might argue that the superintendent was the one attempting to intimidate others the last time that citizen comments were broadcast in his comments to a teacher who stood up for what she believes in.

(I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that the citizen’s comments to the board weren’t broadcast during the board meeting immediately following the superintendent’s “cautioning” of a teacher. You know, the meeting where the citizen’s comments worked against him.)

In the article, Mr. Lankford is quoted as saying, “We’re tired of getting threats;” I’m sure that our teachers, administrators, staff, and parents all agree with him on this.

I’m certain the metal detectors will help with this problem.

Subscribe Via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

  • At one point speaking of all the teacher transfers, J. R. Brooks claimed that all the teachers agreed to the moves. This is not so. #hcs 14 hours ago
  • Board Meeting adjourned. 14 hours ago
  • Ray Landers delaying retirement. Wants to work here because "district fought for him." Going to Hampton Cove Elementary. 14 hours ago
  • Birney says "God I hope so" 14 hours ago
  • Jo Standford: Principal's Academy - to Ed White. #hcs 14 hours ago
Good Reads
 
May 2012
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Tags
Click to view / hide

HCS Facebook Groups
Click to view / hide

Huntsville Blogs
Click to view / hide

Archives
Click to view / hide

Categories
Click to view / hide